Journal Article

·2017 OPEN ACCESS

COMPARISON OF TWO SIMPLIFICATION METHODS FOR SHORELINE EXTRACTION FROM DIGITAL ORTHOPHOTO IMAGES

Bülent Bayram YTU , Alper Şen YTU , Mahmut Oğuz Selbesoğlu YTU , Inese Vārna , P. Petersons , Nedim Onur Aykut YTU , Dursun Zafer Şeker

ISPRS annals of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences

Abstract

Abstract. The coastal ecosystems are very sensitive to external influences. Coastal resources such as sand dunes, coral reefs and mangroves has vital importance to prevent coastal erosion. Human based effects also threats the coastal areas. Therefore, the change of coastal areas should be monitored. Up-to-date, accurate shoreline information is indispensable for coastal managers and decision makers. Remote sensing and image processing techniques give a big opportunity to obtain reliable shoreline information. In the presented study, NIR bands of seven 1:5000 scaled digital orthophoto images of Riga Bay-Latvia have been used. The Object-oriented Simple Linear Clustering method has been utilized to extract shoreline of Riga Bay. Bend and Douglas-Peucker methods have been used to simplify the extracted shoreline to test the effect of both methods. Photogrammetrically digitized shoreline has been taken as reference data to compare obtained results. The accuracy assessment has been realised by Digital Shoreline Analysis tool. As a result, the achieved shoreline by the Bend method has been found closer to the extracted shoreline with Simple Linear Clustering method.

Keywords

Shore Orthophoto Remote sensing Coral reef Bay Mangrove Cluster analysis Coastal erosion Geography Geology Computer science Oceanography Artificial intelligence Ecology

Subject Areas

Coastal and Marine Dynamics ·Earth-Surface Processes ·Physical Sciences
Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications ·Environmental Engineering ·Physical Sciences
Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing ·Oceanography ·Physical Sciences

OpenAlex SDG Match

SDGs auto-classified by OpenAlex (score ≥ 0.4 shown).

Life below water 84%