Abstract
The aim of our article is to investigate to what extent the existing foreign language level determination systems are adaptable to translation and interpretation student profile. We also aim to underline the proficiency level differences and question what type of studies can be done on students’ foreign language level differences. Unlike The Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR), which is accepted as a core stone in foreign language teaching, there is an officially recognized reference system based on “active language” and “passive language” in education of translation and interpretation, particularly conference interpreting.
Keywords
Interpretation (philosophy)
Foreign language
Computer science
Linguistics
Language interpretation
Language proficiency
Natural language processing
Foreign language teaching
Language assessment
Core (optical fiber)
Language industry
Mathematics education
Psychology
Comprehension approach
Natural language
Interpreter
Programming language
Subject Areas
Translation Studies and Practices
·Language and Linguistics ·Social Sciences
Second Language Learning and Teaching
·Literature and Literary Theory ·Social Sciences
Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare
·General Health Professions ·Health Sciences
Citations by Year
2018: 1
2021: 1
2022: 1
2023: 1
OpenAlex SDG Match
SDGs auto-classified by OpenAlex (score ≥ 0.4 shown).
Quality Education 80%
Loading…
Loading…