Journal Article

·2020

Minimising carbon emissions and machining costs with improved human health in sustainable machining of austenitic stainless steel through multi-objective optimisation

I.S. Jawahir , Alper Uysal YTU , James Caudill , Julius Schoop

International Journal of Sustainable Manufacturing

Abstract

Environmental and societal concerns have fuelled an ever growing need for more sustainable products and machining processes. Much research has been focused on this issue in aviation, automotive, and medical industries where austenitic stainless steels have been often used. During machining of these materials, high cutting forces and carbon emissions make the machining process significantly more challenging. Therefore, in this study sustainable orthogonal turning experiments were conducted using dry cutting, MQL, and cryogenic cooling at different cutting speeds and undeformed chip thicknesses. Experimental cutting forces were measured and used to analytically determine the carbon (CO2) emissions. In order to determine the optimal machining parameters for minimising the CO2 emissions and the overall economic cost with improved human health conditions, a multi-objective optimisation problem was established. The optimal machining parameters were determined to be a cutting speed of 100 m/min and undeformed chip thickness of 0.12 mm, while using cryogenic cooling.

Keywords

Machining Chip formation Austenite Materials science Mechanical engineering Carbon steel Metallurgy Automotive industry Carbon fibers Austenitic stainless steel Environmental science Tool wear Engineering Composite material Corrosion Aerospace engineering Microstructure

Subject Areas

Advanced machining processes and optimization ·Mechanical Engineering ·Physical Sciences
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes ·Mechanical Engineering ·Physical Sciences
Advanced Machining and Optimization Techniques ·Electrical and Electronic Engineering ·Physical Sciences

Citations by Year

OpenAlex SDG Match

SDGs auto-classified by OpenAlex (score ≥ 0.4 shown).

Responsible consumption and production 42%